The
Suboptimal Seminar
(Originally
published as 'My Way' - a regular column in the newsletter of the British
Association of Group Psychotherapists - in the Special IAGP Congress Edition,
August 98. The Congress theme by the
way was 'Annihilation, Survival, Re-creation'.)
At a
BAGP seminar some time ago I gave the paper I am proud to be presenting this
week during Congress. This is how it
went.
I
imagined a large dimly lit room humming in anticipation of my presentation:
'The Suboptimal Group'. Row upon row of familiar, half familiar and unknown
faces, all awaiting my paper. People standing at the back. Men smoking pipes and knowingly
nodding. Formidable women all a
flutter. I hear whispers, "By
'suboptimal' does he mean ...." and, "How brave. I couldn't talk
about that, could you?" and, "This is the next big paper .....".
As I enter the room I see a bespectacled, white haired middle aged man in a
lounge suit quietly stroking his beard. Oh, and isn't that Bion over there next
to Melanie and SHF with Queen Elizabeth!!
Earl and Malcolm......
I
launch into my paper. "The suboptimal group exists in similar relation
to the Foulkesian small group. It is the group which persistently exists on or
below the Foulkesian breadline of five members, for which selection and
composition represent distant ideals and, at its other extreme, it is
psychotherapy on the cusp bordering individual and group. It can have as few as
two active members and is precariously close to being something else, be it
individual psychotherapy or inexistence and, as such, survival and annihilation
are key themes - which I will come to later."
Annihilation? As I speak reality begins to dawn. I see
only six others in the room. The empty chairs outnumber the people. Where's the
man in the lounge suit? and all the others?
I stutter on, "The suboptimal group is the group that many of us
work with while attempting to set up and conduct analytic small groups. It is
not the group we hoped we were setting up but is the one we all too often find
ourselves working with."
I
scream, inwardly. Six!!
I wish they would all go away. This can't be happening to me!! I press on and finish. "....
treading a fine line between annihilation and survival. An unsteady equilibrium
can establish itself, one I suggest can be worked with. It is very painful to
conduct and there are pressures to avoid it, however my experience would
suggest, contrary to Foulkesian idealism, that where certain conditions prevail
and group psychotherapy is to be offered, we are faced with little
alternative." Of course the
seven of us then go on to have an interesting discussion. Someone suggests
there may well be another paper being
read somewhere else in London that evening. I imagine that group .....
Then I
remember the week before presenting the same paper to a group of colleagues,
fifteen women and one man, at the Westminster Pastoral Foundation. It went
better than I imagined. They'd lapped it up - like Frank in Las Vegas. I begin to feel a little better. Suboptimal? That's my kind of town.
Peter
Zelaskowski
RETURN TO ARTICLES BY PETER
ZELASKOWSKI